Adam-Troy Castro

Writer of Science Fiction, Fantasy, Horror, and Stories About Yams.

 

The *Actual* Worst Comic Book Movie Adaptation Of All Time

Posted on August 11th, 2015 by Adam-Troy Castro

Let us be honest.

FANTASTIC FOUR (2015) is being dumped on an awful lot, apparently with cause, this week. Many are calling it “the worst comic book adaptation of all time.”

I haven’t seen it. Nor will I.

But in real-world terms it cannot be the worst comic book adaptation “of all time,” because the overall reaction people are having to it is that the movie sucks and that they hope that somebody will make a better Fantastic Four movie someday.

Brought back from the dead to watch it, Jack Kirby would no doubt shudder with irritation and say, “Well, they got that all wrong, how irritating.”

By contrast, imagine Wil Eisner’s reaction were he brought back from the dead to watch the version of THE SPIRIT written and directed by his good friend and self-declared protégé, Frank Miller. Were that gentle man capable of getting angry over matters of make-believe, something I harbor doubts about, he would say, “That little twerp just turned my signature creation into revolting sewage.”

Others have cited CATWOMAN as an iteration as foul, but did it destroy CATWOMAN as a popular character? No, Catwoman remains popular, and was indeed the one great element of THE DARK KNIGHT RISES. The movie didn’t destroy anything. Nor did this one.  The FANTASTIC FOUR still have a following in pop culture, sizable even among many who never picked up so much as a single issue of the comic book, and though this is a crazy-making admission to make, there will likely be another in less than five years. (Which is itself a statement about everything that’s gone wrong with the movie biz, but a testament to the hunger for a FANTASTIC FOUR movie that gets it right.)

By contrast, more, in terms of the character’s shadow, was riding on THE SPIRIT, and the movie failed it that much more egregiously. THE SPIRIT didn’t just fail the comics. It didn’t just trample them. It told the world that the trail-blazing character was an offensive piece of crap, and the world, bereft of is context, listened.

Other movies have done this. Comic book fans are well used to telling people who only know their favorite characters from the movies that Jonah Hex is really a brilliant character, that John Constantine is really a brilliant character, that The Punisher can be brilliant crime fiction, that Howard the Duck is a wonderful satiric creation, that League of Extraordinary Gentlemen is really a brilliant comic. It happens all the time. Some of these films destroyed any chance the comic book properties had of ever escaping their four-color roots, and entering the zeitgeist. Certainly, few films did as much to stamp down a then-cult character as HOWARD THE DUCK, but even that movie had isolated moments, lines, scenes, images, that captured what the morose mallard was all about, and there has been idle talk of bringing him back into the Marvel Cinematic Universe in some fashion. He’s one good screenplay, one good miniseries, away from rehabilitation.

But THE SPIRIT?

THE SPIRIT is now known, to many people, as the rancid creation that Frank Miller made, and a punch-line — and if I happen to judge it more harshly than any of the other cited failures, it is because the depth of the violation is that much more offensive. To the world the Spirit is now the guy whose fight scenes involve the use of toilet bowls as clubs, and a black villain in a gestapo uniform. It is not just awful, it is actively revolting.

Really, the Fantastic Four movie can’t compete.

Seven Atheist Arguments For The Existence of God

Posted on August 9th, 2015 by Adam-Troy Castro

First published on Facebook January 5 2012.

I am a non-believer who has no real problem with religion as long as it is not forced on others or used as the justification for ignorance, oppression, or discrimination against the non-believer.

Still, there’s this. Just because I do not personally accept “The Holy Book says so,” or “There’s no other explanation for creation” as valid arguments for the existence of God, doesn’t mean I fail to concede some points in the opposite direction. For the sake of argument, are there any arguments in favor of believing in a deity?

I’ve come up with seven. I find that almost all of them hinge on the definition of that most nebulous term, “God.”

1) God has been described as “everything that is.” I’m not willing to posit a bearded old white man or even a disembodied consciousness as God, but it would be foolish to dispute the existence of “everything;” hence, by that limited definition, God exists.

2) God has also been described as the sum total of physical laws in the universe. Physical laws exist. Again, it may not be your mythology, but by that limited definition, God exists.

3) God has also been described as a force beyond our comprehension. I may not believe that He sat on his mountaintop and dictated Deuteronomy, but I do understand that there are forces beyond our comprehension. Hence, by that limited definition, God exists.

4) God has also been described as something that is worshipped. We may not believe that the worship is warranted, but it would be foolish to declare that it doesn’t take place. You worship a cat, you worship money, you worship an old white man, then those things are your gods, even when they’re mere fables. I can’t say that nobody worships God. Hence, by that limited definition, God exists.

5) Before the belief in God in as an omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent being, ancient societies defined gods as powerful entities with powers we could barely fathom. See the Greeks, the Romans, and so on. The pantheon they talked about was powerful and contentious, but by the usual modern definition of God they were merely a bunch of cranks who sat around playing tricks on one another. If you buy the premise that there is likely such a thing as extraterrestrial life, somewhere, you must also buy that much of it is likely more advanced than us, perhaps even tremendously more advanced than us. Following Clarke’s dictum that a sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic, and that specific limited definition, Gods exist.

6) God has finally been described as the one force that can cause miracles. So now it becomes an issue of defining “miracle.” The word has been used to define events that range from outright impossibilities to mere fortuitous strokes of good luck that defy chance. The word has also been used to label everyday happy events like the birth of babies and unlikely happy events like survival, unhurt, from terrible car wrecks. It has finally been vused to events that had to happen, including the victory of one hockey team over another, an odd definition of miracle when everybody knew, entering the game, that one of the two competitors had to win and that the outcome was merely a matter of differing odds. Still, while we may not necessarily believe that a bearded figure sitting on a throne made any personal decisions affecting any of these occasions – or even, as in the case of the hockey team, that even if he did exist he might not particularly consider the result his personal business — it would nevertheless be foolish to argue that the birth of babies, unlikely happy outcomes, and the victory of last-place hockey teams are phenomena unknown to us. If we must use the word “miracle” in relation to these events and define God as that which causes them – even if that means God amounts to just the sum total of contributing circumstances – then, by that precise limited definition, God exists.

7) Stephen Hawking has survived to reach age seventy. Thank you, God.

On Rejection By Those Who Did Not Know I Was There

Posted on August 4th, 2015 by Adam-Troy Castro

Two or three times in my life I have been wandering the bookstore when I just randomly came across some child, holding one of my books, and begging his mother to buy it; and the mother telling the child no, either because she wasn’t in the mood to buy something for him right now, or because to her eye my book looked like a piece of trash.

I have all three times watched the entire exchange, which was always less than a minute long, and all three times I felt the overpowering urge to interfere by identifying myself, which I always rejected as counter-productive and likely easy to perceive as threatening. On all three occasions I refrained, and walked away feeling bad.

This is of course countered by those occasions at school and bookstore signings where some wide-eyed, awestruck child comes up to me with a copy of GUSTAV (or before that, SPIDER-MAN), that she clearly regards as a life treasure. I have seen that a whole bunch of times, and it is wonderful. Such occasions lift my spirits and energize my muse, when they happen. The only difference is that they are canned events, where my work is clearly at the center of the day. In candid everyday life, I have only personally witnessed, “Mom, will you get me this?” and “No, I’m not getting you that,” the reply twice uttered with a certain degree of revulsion. It was always a gentle kick in the teeth and I was always faced with the awareness that my part in the transaction is already over.

It’s a sobering realization.

 
 
 

Copyright © 2011 Adam-Troy Castro Designed by Brandy Hauman