Adam-Troy Castro

Writer of Science Fiction, Fantasy, Horror, and Stories About Yams.

 

The Silliest Trigger Warning Complaint Of All Time

Posted on May 18th, 2015 by Adam-Troy Castro

Just saw somebody say this in a thread.

“I’ve been a fan up until now. But it was completely inexcusable to not have a trigger warning on this episode…”

My continued dismay with the whole premise of trigger warnings aside, can there truly be a viewer who has been “a fan up until now,” who has somehow gotten this many seasons into GAME OF THRONES and not realized that the story traffics in upsetting you with violent developments?

Seriously, Sansa Stark was escorted to her wedding by a fellow she ws raised alongside, who in previous episodes was chained to a wall and tortured at length, who was teased erect by a prostitute so his penis could be chopped off without anaesthetic, all this after he incinerated two children who he wants the world to believe are the two fugitive sons of a man who was beheaded and a woman who had her throat slit at the wedding of another son to a pregnant woman who minutes after they were pronounced Man and Wife had a dagger jabbed into her abdomen multiple times, at the behest of a family that includes a woman who is at one point raped by her twin brother, with whom she had a psychotic son who forced prostitutes to whip each other for his amusement.

And you want a trigger warning for THIS episode?

Were you under the impression that you were watching the Rankin-Bass version of THE HOBBIT up until now?

The argument is not whether GAME OF THRONES is any good, or uses these shocking moments in a responsible manner;  I would say yes in both cases, but am not here today to debate the point. The argument is whether you can get past all that and still declare yourself violated without sufficient advance warning if the next development that comes galloping down the pike happens to upset you. How could you have not figured out by now that this story traffics in upset? It’s like having the vapors about gun violence the tenth time Dirty Harry shoots somebody. This many seasons in, can you actually pretend that you were unaware of the nature of the show you’ve been watching all along? Or did you watch the Red Wedding and think, “Okay, the bad part’s over, everybody’s going to be nice to each other from now on? It’s never going to get untidy again?”

When were you going to figure out otherwise, if not in all the years up to now?

On the Roar of Approval For Self-Defenestration

Posted on May 17th, 2015 by Adam-Troy Castro

You’re a decent person. You really are.

Oh, sure, you have some bad habits, some irritating beliefs, some things you do that get on the nerves on people around you. But by all the low bars, you’re a decent person. You don’t molest children. You don’t attack people with broken bottles. You don’t set bombs. You’re good to your family and polite enough to people who are polite to you. In some ways, you’re admirable. Even noble. Your worst enemy, considering the way you live your life, would acknowledge it.

But then we get to the part of you that is objectionable. You’re just a little bigoted, just a little misogynistic, just a little homophobic, just a little xenophobic – any one of those four things, to some level, in some combination.

You are not any of these things to the degree of all-out, full-bore toxicity. They are trace elements, the same things that many of us have. Maybe they are a bit stronger in you than they are in some people who we would consider more enlightened – and maybe you have many compensating virtues.

As a character flaw, this is like a managed medical condition, in that it is possible for you to live with it comfortably, and for you to control it without causing too much offense to others, possibly even without them being visible to others.

But here’s the problem. You then surround yourself with the wrong people.

You make friends among folks who will not correct you when you step over those invisible lines, but who will instead applaud you, who will react to you most positively when you slip up and allow this ugly lesion on your character to hang exposed. They laugh and clap and tell you that you’re speaking truth, when instead you’re engaging in a little bit of social Tourette’s. They call over others, even worse than themselves, and before long you find yourself playing to a crowd that is itself getting worse and worse.

Here’s the thing.

People can be trained, the same way dogs can. Even the most refined person, spending a few weeks in the company of the coarse, will find his language becoming more vulgar, his behavior more gross; if he hangs out with friends who think that it’s a great idea to yell “pussy” at women he doesn’t know, and earns their applause when he does so, his attitudes and actions will come to reflect that, just as his attitudes and actions would have come to reflect hanging out with people who would react to such behavior by telling him he’s not funny and that he should quit it.

A decent man who doesn’t consider himself a bigot can indeed be trained to behave like a bigot if he welcomes feedback exclusively from those who consider bigotry no big deal, or indeed an attribute to be admired.

The feedback loop can be toxic. You only have to look at some highly-concentrated internet communities to see human beings who might be perfectly respectable people, away from the keyboard, engaged in rhetoric of the most insane sort, because they spend time with the insane, and receive their cues from the insane. You can see writers who have attracted a fine group of sycophants around themselves, giving them thumbs up as they spew bile and venom of the worst sort. This is why it’s a good reason, on and off the internet, to cultivate the company of those who would, (forgive me from quoting Aaron Sorkin, but it’s an elegant and concise phrase) spend their lives advocating at the top of their lungs what you would spend your life opposing at the top of your lungs.

In the absence of open toxicity, the people opposed to everything you believe in are the reality check that prevent you from sinking into open toxicity yourself. Like a few of them as people and you will surprised how measured and rational it makes you. Declare them non-people and refuse their company and you will be surprised how quickly you become the mirror image of that which you find most sickening.

But above all: don’t allow the most vile elements in your character to attract a crowd that you will then feel you need to play to. Don’t flatter the gibbons. Don’t let them define you, don’t shift to please them, don’t let them move you farther into the realm of the insane, until you become their creature; until you are what they would have you be, until you are no longer aware of who you are.

There is such a thing as a shared psychosis, a view of reality so insane that it can only develop when somebody only listens to people who believe a particular stupid thing, and will not accept reality checks from outside. It doesn’t happen because of any organic reason. It happens because no context is accepted, other than that which furthers the narrative. See Randy Quaid and his wife. See the two young New Zealanders profiled in HEAVENLY CREATURES. It happens to groups of friends, to entire political parties, to nations; it can certainly happen between, for instance, an author and his supportive fans.

Limit your inputs to only those that support a certain kind of self-destructive behavior and you can be cheered with enthusiasm as you drive yourself off a cliff.

This is equally true whether you’re talking about private life, or existence as any level of public figure.

Play to the base, and I promise you, absolutely vow to you, that you will become base. I promise you, honestly. You don’t want this.

When everybody outside your crowd is telling you that your crowd is making you a terrible person, you should give it serious consideration. You really should.

The Things That Happen To Some Stories, In the Writing Of Them

Posted on May 14th, 2015 by Adam-Troy Castro

Sometimes, the story sticks its toe in the dirt and tells you it’s not going to go where you want it to go. Most often, the story is right. It knows better than you do. Listen to it. It’s telling you this for your own good. It knows itself better than you do.

Now the backstory. Pay attention.

Months ago, I contracted to contribute a story to Michael Jan Friedman’s shared-world PANGAEA anthology. The story dropped dead at 2000 words and went moribund on me. If you had asked me on Monday whether it would ever be finished, I would have said no. But the deadline was knocking on my door and on Tuesday I elected to give it another shot. The story remained moribund. Again, it didn’t look like it was going to happen. I was about to throw up my hands, even if that would have cheated a fan who paid a hundred dollars to have his name applied to one of the characters.

Then it suddenly occurred to me that the tragedy I had outlined was the problem; I simply had no faith in it. It was an exercise in futility, that would take thousands of words to clumsily steer in a direction that would get less and less interesting the nearer I approached a downbeat conclusion. What ELSE could happen?

2500 words a day, last two days, the last two of them being THE END.

“A Dearth of Dragons,” which may not be the final title, is 7K, just short of novelette length, though it may pick up another five hundred (or lose that many) during tomorrow’s polish.

Only in the first act does it resemble the story it started out to be. Then better stuff happens.

This is always a surprise to the writer; a welcome surprise.

Also, in case it’s not clear by now:  I write some awfully formidable women.

 
 
 

Copyright © 2011 Adam-Troy Castro Designed by Brandy Hauman