Adam-Troy Castro

Writer of Science Fiction, Fantasy, Horror, and Stories About Yams.

 

I Actually Have More Than Enough Underwear

Posted on June 21st, 2015 by Adam-Troy Castro

Yes, I am aware that is more information about me than any sane person could possibly want.

I share it only to illustrate a mathematical principle, of sorts.

I can always use more t-shirts.

I can always use more pants.

I am always running short of socks.

However, I have more than enough underwear.

For a long time my underwear accumulation rate exceeded my rate of obsolescence, and therefore I am always nowhere near having an empty drawer at the point when the available pairs are replenished.

I have enough to get through almost a month without a laundry.

This is not a bad thing when laundry is weekly.

But it leads to a surreal resource management issue.

I am in particular thinking of a certain plastic-wrapped package of five boxer briefs that the wife bought me more than a year ago. They sit in my underwear drawer, like a survival kit that has never needed its seal broken.

Every once in a while the wife looks at them with annoyance and says, “You haven’t opened that package yet.” I say, why should I? The need is not urgent.

So there’s a certain simmering dramatic tension between the impulse to acknowledge that my wife did a considerate thing by buying me underwear and the practical reality that I have never been desperate enough to break the seal on that bag. I am always at least {the contents of that bag plus one} away from having to open that bag.

And yet the annoyance level remains. The most unsullied underwear in the house is not living up to its share of the responsibility.

The bag rebukes me.

It was only yesterday that Judi twigged to the answer: hey. Next time I have to pack to go on a trip, I toss that bag in the suitcase.

That way, I don’t have to worry about folding them, or fitting them in; I have a single self-contained object that functions as special equipment.

At which point it will be time to buy a new sealed bag to sit in that drawer and rebuke me.

We greeted this epiphany with far more excitement than it was worth. At last! The sealed bag of underwear has a purpose! Calloo, Callay!

But then the replacement bag becomes the irritant.

This is a first-world problem.

The Face of The Rage-Monster

Posted on June 19th, 2015 by Adam-Troy Castro

“Conservative” is one thing. “Republican” is another. Sometimes it’s a strain, but I still avoid making broad generalizations. I’m not attacking all of you. This is not about that.

But more often that not, when somebody comes on my Facebook page and accelerates straight from zero to invading Poland in less than fifteen seconds, calling all the liberals names, attacking people on a personal basis, and proclaiming themselves the farthest possible thing from bigots, when I then investigate their own page, I find within my first thirty seconds of looking a meme in which a gun is pointed at the observer, and some gleeful celebration of being able to shoot somebody who comes to take their stuff.

This isn’t about the Second Amendment. This isn’t about plinking bottles or paper targets or animals that you can then have for dinner. This is about how, inevitably, when you encounter one of these rage monsters, one of the most prominent images on their pages is always, always, that gun pointed at the observer, and some clever way of saying that sooner or later they’ll get to pump lead into the chest of some bad guy. In extreme cases it’s about pumping lead into “libs” or “Muslims” or “Hillary,” or anybody who votes the wrong way, or “the government,” but we’re avoiding tarring everybody with the excesses of the extremists, so we’ll put those iterations aside, and concentrate on the more general fantasy, that of sooner or later being able to make red rose blossoms appear on the chests of bad men.

Whenever I investigate one of these rage monsters, it’s one of the first images I see.

They define themselves as the guys who can shoot you.

I know liberals who have guns. I know non-rage monsters, liberal and conservatives,  who have guns. They don’t all put bumper stickers on their cars saying, “WARNING CRIMINALS, I HAVE A GUN.” They don’t all use their Facebook pages to post images of some fierce-looking fantasy construct aiming the barrel at the observer. They don’t all lead with promises of deadly violence against the first person who messes with them. But these guys I reference, it’s an important part of their self-image. They live their lives fetishizing their guns and plotting to get more so they can fight off the armies marching to take away the guns they already have. They open-carry in places where only a jackass who gets aroused from intimidating strangers would open-carry. They fantasize, and share their fantasies, of the consummation that marks itself with a pool of blood.

Human beings celebrate their ids. I get that. It’s the same reason why so many cars bear that bootleg, unauthorized image of Calvin from CALVIN AND HOBBES pissing on the ground with an evil look on his face. I don’t claim to be immune to that. I’m a wordsmith; I take pleasure in the verbal evisceration of the deserving. But human beings celebrate other things too. They celebrate climbing mountains, doing their friends favors, meeting someone wonderful.  You can even celebrate a skill, like marksmanship. As I have said: I am taking ridiculous pains to not make this a simplistic screed against guns. Marksmanship is something to celebrate. But to separate from the vast spectrum of human experience, and render primary, the savage rush of being able to promise people you don’t like that you can punch holes in them, to present this as an important thing about yourself, to take pleasure and pride in the prospect, to make this emblematic of your being, you really must have stacked your pleasures in the wrong order: a deeply unpleasant and hate-fueled order. You have begun to look forward to killing, to dream about it, to hope for the opportunity to make it happen. That makes you a toxin on the face of the planet.

Every single time I encounter one of these rage-monsters, that’s the image I see. I swear. Every single goddamned time.

A WEDDING

Posted on June 18th, 2015 by Adam-Troy Castro

Robert Altman’s A WEDDING is high second-tier on my personal list of favorite movies. It’s about just that, a comedy-drama about two dozen characters interacting at an elaborate but scandal-prone wedding, in which we learn more than we ever wanted to know about the pathologies of everybody involved.

It stars Carol Burnett, but really, the cast is huge. Lillian Gish came out of retirement to play the family matriarch.

I am in awe, in particular, about what you learn of the groom’s father, an immigrant who had to completely forsake his own family, by contract, in order to marry into this wealthy and largely awful clan. The groom’s mother is a junkie who employs a kept doctor, played by Howard Duff, to keep her stoned to near-catatonia. And so on.

Anyway. One of the subsidiary characters is played by Mia Farrow, who is here the clearly disturbed sister of the bride, a girl who never speaks at any point except to utter one word, her only word in the whole movie, which is timed to make the room erupt in horror.

Farrow is brilliant in the almost-wordless role.

But it’s the character I’m thinking of. She is a terrible person. She is a disturbed person. We see in glimpses that she hates herself and everybody around her, and that her vague smile, which she wears constantly, only puts a pleasant face on a soul that is really only interested in being the center of attention.

At one point, when she achieves the notoriety she seeks, and everybody is swooning with scandalized horror, when the room around her has erupted with weeping and carrying on, she beams with delight.

Delight.

At having brought scandal to the party. Which is now fully about her. Which is what she wanted.

 
 
 

Copyright © 2011 Adam-Troy Castro Designed by Brandy Hauman